The Secret Life of the Alienated Child

An alienated child is a child with a set of defensive structures which enable them to carry on with life as normal, even whilst coping with the overwhelming trauma of being forced to regulate an unpredictable caregiver. Over the past fifteen years, I have worked with over a hundred severely alienated children and have come to know their experience both inside and out. What I now know about alienated children is that the behaviour which looks unpredictable from the outside, is understandable and predictable when its cause and effect is known. This year I will be working with formerly alienated children who are now young adults, to support them in telling their stories to the outside world so that the secret life they were forced to live whilst in the care of an unwell, unpredictable and abusive parent, is a secret no more.

At the end of last year, two formerly alienated children told their stories in the Palace of Westminster at a small seminar for policy makers, practitioners and parents. This quiet opening of the door to the secret world that alienated children are forced to live in, was just the beginning. This year these young people, along with others who have been assisted by the Family Separation Clinic, will speak at more events and conferences, to help the world to understand the particular difficulties that children in divorce and separation face when they are in the care of a parent who is harming them. All of these young people are now fully recovered after being found to be in the care of an abusive parent who could not or would not recognise that what they were doing was harming their child. In working with each of these children and others, I have come to to recognise that the secret world of the alienated child is no different to that of all children who are suffering abuse at the hands of a parent, it is secret for a reason and in most cases, it is a secret so deeply held that even the child is unable to be aware of it.

Alienation is a good word for what happens to children who align with an abusive caregiver and reject the other. Alienation means to withdraw or become isolated from the environment and other people and in the case of children in family separation, alienation extends even to becoming alienated from one’s own sense of self. In trauma terms, self alienation is described by Janina Fisher (2017), as having originated from a childhood experience of traumatic neglect. In the experiences of children who were found to have been harmed by a parent in divorce or separation, who were seen as strongly aligned to one parent and completely rejecting of the other, that traumatic neglect is recognised in the inability of the abusive parent to understand and put the child’s needs before their own. You can watch Janina Fisher talking about self-alienation and the fragmented selves of trauma survivors here.

In my work with alienated children I have come to understand that their experience of having to regulate an unpredictable caregiver, is hidden far from the outside world because of the utter dependency the child has upon that parent. In this respect, it is not so much that the child is hiding the abuse they are suffering, they are adapting their attachment relationships in order to stay safe in a world which feels terrifying to them, meaning that the child seeks to divine the needs of the frightening parent in order to mirror to the parent what they think they need. This is conversant with the concept of identification with the aggressor which was first identified by Anna Freud, in which the child adopts the behaviours of someone with control over them who cannot be escaped from or otherwise managed. Examples of children identifying with parents who aggress against their children are seen when a child is exposed to parental anger about something the other parent is doing, or when a child is exposed to adult issues as if they are an equal party to the person sharing information with them. In some areas of research, the idea of children working in a partnership with one parent against the other, has been presented as a good thing, in an effort to normalise a parent/child coalition (Katz, 2022). In psychological terms however, exposure to adult feelings or fragilities in the adult to adult relationship, will always pose a threat to the integrated sense of self of a child, because of the neglect of the child’s right to a sovereign sense of self which is unburdened by adult matters. This is the point at which neglect of parental duty to preserve the child’s right to a childhood protected from triangulation into adult matters becomes traumatic to the child, because the very person who the child relies upon to protect them from harm, becomes the person who is the source of fear and anxiety in the child’s life.

The deep sense of fear and anxiety felt by children who are being triangulated into adult matters, is demonstrated by the onset of attachment maladaptations and specifically, when the traumatic impact has reached a point where the child becomes overwhelmed by the anxiety caused by regulating an unpredictable caregiver. In this scenario, the child’s sense of self fragments and the onset of splitting is evidenced by the idealisation of the frightening caregiver and the demonisation of the other parent. This splitting, resolves the problem for the child, which is how to regulate a frightening caregiver whilst being in a situation where they must have a relationship with the despised object triggering the behaviour in the frightening caregiver. As children in this situation become hyper sensitised to the environment in which they live, when they are repeatedly exposed to the behaviours of a parent who has come to despise the other parent, they will quickly sense the need to fall into line with the demands of that caregiver, seeking to predict what that person needs in order to keep them regulated. In order to survive this unsurvivable traumatic act of dividing their parents into one who is loved and one who is hated, the child buries the part of self which contains the love and positive feelings for the now despised parent into the unconscious, where it languishes with all of the attendant anxieties until such time that the child is free enough from the domination of the frightening caregiver to be able to tolerate awareness of those feelings again. For some children who are deeply terrorised, awareness of this freedom takes a very long time, for others, perhaps those who are faced with parents in the rejected position who are angry, distressed or no longer there, the capacity to recover an integrated sense of self is compromised for much longer.

This is the secret life of the alienated child, a life which is so secret that even the children who experience it do not know it is there until they are faced with the consequences of what they have been forced to do to themselves and to the parent they have rejected, often much later in life. For those young people who were removed from the parent causing them harm, a parent who prior to the removal had been chaotic and terrifying at times and at others had been caring and loving, the only signs of the abuse they had been suffering was in their disorganised attachment behaviours which were identified within a family court process. When removed from the abusive parent’s care to be placed in the kinship care of the parent they had been rejecting, each of these children began to experience a consistency of care which provided the platform for recovery and in recovery, each showed the impact of splitting which lies beneath the ‘going on as normal’ part of self which is identified in the psychological literature as a response to trauma.

After fifteen years working with the secret lives of alienated children, I have come to understand how the trauma they are surviving has been manipulated and misrepresented. Children are not given to abusive parents, they are removed from them in situations where it is identified that the caregiver with control over the child is causing fear and anxiety. Whilst there is a long way to go before we achieve uniform understanding of this and whilst those of us who do this work must continue to face fierce attack upon our reputations from those trying to distract attention from the child abuse we are working with, it is a moral imperative that we continue to raise awareness of the secret life of the alienated child because if we do not do so, the secret harm they are suffering will continue to be perpetrated upon them. 

It took many years for the reality of child sexual abuse to be finally accepted as reality, it is taking just as many years for the reality of this emotional and psychological abuse of children in family separation to be seen and heard. As the young people who lived with and recovered from this secret harm begin to speak about it, I hope that the acceptance of this will increase rapidly until it is a secret no more.

References

Fisher, J. (2017). Healing the fragmented selves of trauma survivors: Overcoming internal self-alienation. Routledge.

Katz, E. (2022). Coercive Control in Children’s and Mothers’ Lives. Oxford University Press.


Family Separation Clinic News

The Family Separation Clinic will be holding a series of events this year at which formerly alienated children who are now young adults will share their stories of being removed from an abusive parent in residence transfer. In addition, new books by these young people and a Handbook of Therapeutic Parenting for Alienated Children which is informed by work with them, will be published. This is the year in which the secret life of the alienated child will be opened up to public scrutiny, informing policy makers and practitioners all over the world about the need to assist alienated children and the best routes to doing so. We are exceptionally grateful to the young people and the parents who have cared for them, for this opportunity to build public awareness about the work of the Clinic over the past fifteen years in order to educate others about how to work with children of divorce and separation who show signs of being seriously harmed.

Evaluation outputs, testimony and books will be published over the coming year and will be showcased in conferences, seminars and other events which I will detail here in due course.

11 thoughts on “The Secret Life of the Alienated Child”

  1. This is a very sad reflection of the current state of my childs mind. In such a short space of time I have witnessed my daughter splitting from her genuine and authentic self, having a loving relationship with her father, to a child who is mirroring her mum’s hostility and disdain. So grateful to Karen to empower me with knowledge and understanding.

    Like

    1. Karen,
      YOU are a lighthouse to us rejected parents who have been living in this hellish alternative reality, where white is black and black is white. Your extensive research, passion, empathic approach and intellect provide much needed validation, bearing witness, and most of all, offer support and a healthy path forward. I’m so appreciative to have found you. Thank you for all you do. Laurie B.

      Like

      1. Thank you Laurie and everyone who writes to say thank you to me, I appreciate it more than you can ever know. In a world where right is wrong and up is down, I share your experience of trying to hold onto reality in a world of other people’s split off negative projections. Like all things which are denied at first, eventually the truth will be seen, I know that at the deepest part of me and I know that when it is seen more widely, more people will come to the coal face and more children will be prevented from having to go through this and more parents will be protected from the terrible harms they suffer. 2024 is a big year as we open the door on the experiences of children who are now recovered but in all aspects we keep on putting one foot in front of the other. Together.

        Like

  2. Karen, what is your view on this situation please?

    Every child goes through puberty, with all the natural pulling away from parents that involves. Obviously, any decent parent tries to consider and adjust to that.

    But in separated families, the child is with the resident parent (RP) for the vast majority of the time and the non resident parent (NRP), usually the father, for the token amount of time allowed by family law, two days out of every fourteen.

    The child seeks to exercise their new found individual personality, and begins to pull away. If the RP is responsible they would co-parent with the NRP to manage this. However, if the RP tends to alienation they will misdirect the child’s natural independence urge to rejecting the NRP.

    From the child’s perspective, it is easy and sensible, if not essential, to pull away from the NRP. Indeed reject them entirely. It is a win-win for them. It satisfies their biological instinct. It pleases the parent who is already established as the primary carer, because of their RP status.

    This appears to me, to be the simple basis for parental alienation and how it endures for years, if not decades, if not for that child’s whole life.

    In your view, is this a reasonable opinion? And if so, is there any way for the NRP / rejected parent to address it? As it seems to me to be an impossible task.

    Thanks for your consideration and your commitment to human wellbeing.

    Like

    1. Thanks for your question, I think your opinion is fair and that the position of being an NRP is almost like being a rejected parent in waiting, the whole RP vs NRP thing has always been a problem in my view, one parent is positioned as the ‘proper’ parent and the other is the subsidiary parent, always an unnecessary symbolic message to children which in my view contributes to the sense of distance children feel from their NRP.

      In fact during puberty children must pull away from both parents in order to establish themselves as indepedent young adults and in an ordinary world both parents would work together to facilitate that but this is not an ordinary world and the RP can move to expedite the pulling away from the NRP if they act according to their own feelings not according to the wellbeing of the child.

      The NRP must be nimble and flexible during puberty, must relinquish expectations of caring as they normally would wish to and be ready to be available to be taxi driver, helper, filler inner, present when needed and available as flexibly as possible. The purpose of this is to ensure proximity to the child through this difficult phase – so that the child knows that you are still there but are not going to demand of them the same proximity as before but that you are not going away entirely either. This doesn’t mean being a slave to your child, you must put in proper boundaries – ie I will be your taxi driver with reasonable notice but you are not going to muck me about either….. an exchange of an authentic sentence or two during a ride together is worth a hundred hours of silent resentful time together during this period, your aim is to make sure you are still present in their conscious minds in some way until the full development of their capacity to listen to and use reasoned thinking. I am writing more about this in our new handbook due out soon and you can learn more about it on our Holding up a Healthy Mirror course too. Sending my best Karen

      Like

      1. Hi, focusing on the RP/NRP matter specifically, I read time and time again that it is the RP who is usually the alienator. This is not always the case and it would be helpful to see some statistics and case studies about NRP alienators.
        I was the RP and through the thick and thin of emerging alienating tactics by the NRP, nonetheless I always respected my child’s relationship with the NRP father. However after 12 years in an out of court, it was finally determined last year only that the NRP father has NPD. All that time, despite emerging evidence in my child, the court and the authorities failed to recognise the alienation and abuse. So we have not been supported at all and over the past two years entered the severe alienation and splitting stage. My child has now rejected me completely, and is now in care. I haven’t seen my child for over a year – the first of many to come.
        The local authority still fails every week to properly recognise this form of child abuse, or have any clue as to what to do about it. My child has now aged out of the process and it is likely my child and I will never see each other again. My child is now just a photo on the mantelpiece frozen in time aged 12, as if no longer living.

        It would be helpful, to say the least, if the authorities would focus on the deep psychology at play in severe alienation and less on labels and genders.
        Alienating behaviours are real.
        They can be perpetrated by RPs or NRPs – whether mother or fathers.
        When NPD is woven in, the risks are even worse.
        Whatever it is called and whoever is doing it – it is child abuse.

        Yet when recognised early on, and when children are younger, it should be possible to contain/halt the devastating and inevitable trajectory of severe alienation, splitting and rejection. Then we can help our kids find their own way through adolescence and into adulthood with our gentle support, as you say.

        Like

  3. Thank you for this post, it is so insightful. But I wish the social workers could read and understand it!
    Can I ask, in the situation where the child has not been supported by the authorities through their persistent misunderstanding of the psychology of alienation and splitting, is it right for the local authority to continue to allow that child to have (in our case, fortnightly supervised video) contact with the abusive parent? And is it right that the child’s rejection of the safe parent should prevail? Ie, should the authority allow the child (as manipulated by the abusive parent) to control their outcomes, or should the authority show its authority in determining arrangements to protect the child?
    Or is there a point at which the child has aged out of the process, where their false threats of suicide present as a risk too great for the authorities to take control?
    What is the oldest child you have still been able to rescue and treat?
    Thank you

    Like

Leave a comment